An ERP study on the semantic processing of unambiguous noun, unambiguous verb and verb-noun ambiguous word in mandarin Chinese
汉语名词、动词和动名兼类词语义加工的ERP研究
Quansheng Xia 夏全胜; Yong Lv 吕勇; Xuejun Bai 白学军; Feng Shi 石锋

Abstract 摘要
This paper is intended to explore the semantic processing of unambiguous noun, unambiguous verb and verb-noun ambiguous word in Mandarin Chinese by using event-related potentials (ERP). The experiment, which was conducted in the lexical decision task, contained four sets of stimuli: disyllabic unambiguous nouns (UN), unambiguous verbs (UV), verb-biased (V-VN) and noun-biased (N-VN) verb-noun ambiguous words. The results showed that the amplitude values of P2 and N400 corresponding to the semantic processing were greater for UN and UV than for V-VN and N-VN and UN elicited greater P2 and N400 than UV. Furthermore, the results indicated that the N400 component included a frontal “imagistically sensitive N400” and a posterior “linguistically sensitive N400”. The amplitudes of N400 activated by UN and UV were more negative than those of V-VN and N-VN on the frontal electrodes because UN and UV were more concrete than V-VN and N-VN. Meanwhile, N400 on the posterior scalp sites was related to semantic features. UN that designated men and things elicited higher N400 than UV, V-VN and N-VN; UV that referred to action and behaviors elicited higher N400 than V-VN and N-VN; V-VN and N-VN that referred to behaviors and designated event elicited smaller N400 values. Besides, N-VN elicited a LPC component that was the reflection of confidence in the decision-making process, with more positive magnitude than UN, UV and V-VN. It indicated that the decision confidence of N-VN was greater than that of UN, UV and V-VN because N-VN was more notable in semantic activation. V-VN that had multiple meanings elicited higher LPC than UN and UV on some electrodes, indicating that the decision confidence was higher for V-VN than for UN and UV. Since both UN and VN had a single meaning, they were less notable in semantic activation, which resulted in less decision confidence and lower LPC amplitudes. The results of LPC reflected the continuum of grammatical classes as “UV—V-VN—N-VN—UN’, which provided the supporting evidence for the conformance of syntax level and semantic level.

本文运用ERP技术,通过词汇判断任务,对汉语双音节名词、动词和动名兼类词的语义加工机制进行了研究。实验结果显示,名词、动词和动名兼类词在P2、N400和LPC上都存在差 异。P2 和N400体现了名词、动词和动名兼类词的语义差异。N400还可以进一步分为前部脑区分布的N400和后部脑区分布的N400。其中,前部脑区分布的N400主要与具体性有关,名 词和动词比动名兼类词更加具体,所以它们的N400波幅比动名兼类词的更大;后部脑区分布的N400主要与语义特征有关,指称人和事物的名词N400波幅最大,表示动作和行为的动 词N400波幅较小,表示行为和指称活动的动名兼类词N400波幅最小。LPC体现词汇判断时的确定性。偏(名)的语义激活最多,判断的确定性较高,其LPC波幅最大;偏(动)的语 义激活较多,判断的确定性高于名词和动词,其LPC波幅较大;名词和动词只激活单一语义,最不容易判断,其LPC最小。名词、动词、偏(动)和偏(名)在LPC上的关系,可反映 “动词-偏(动)-偏(名)-名词”这个体现句法功能的连续统,说明语言的句法层面与语义层面是对应一致的。

Subject Keywords 关键词

Unambiguous noun 名词 Unambiguous verb 动词 Verb-noun ambiguous words 动名兼类词 Semantic processing 语义加工 ERP 事件相关电位

Article 文章

<< Back 返回

Readers 读者