i) A statement of the issues under review.
ii) The allegation(s) made by the complainant.
iii) The evidence adduced in support of the allegation(s).
iv) The response of the person of whom complaint is made to the allegation(s).
v) The evidence adduced in rebuttal of the allegation(s).
vi) The finding of facts following the investigation.
vii) A determination as to whether the complaint (s) is established.
viii) Recommended course(s) of action.

The Panel Convenor will appoint at least one panelist independent of the investigation (the “Independent Reviewer”) to review the fact-finding report. The Independent Reviewer will review the fact-finding report to ensure that the procedures have been complied with, that the report is set out in accordance with 25(a) above and that the determination on the complaint is in accordance with the facts as found. The Independent Reviewer may (i) endorse the report for submission to the Panel Convenor or (ii) remit the report to the Investigating Team for clarification or further explanation or re-consideration of all or any part of the report before agreeing to forward it to the Panel Convenor; and in the event of either (i) or (ii) the Independent Reviewer may add any comment or observation for consideration by the Panel Convenor.