|
3. Lorenz curve and Gini Coefficient
- The Lorenz curve is obtained by plotting the cumulative
percentages of household income against the cumulative percentages
of the numbero fhouseholds, starting from households with
the lowest income. Chart 1 is an example of the Lorenz curve.
The Lorenz curve would be a line of equality if there is
an absolutely equal distribution of income. The degree of
income disparity is reflexted by the extent to which the
Lorenz curve is concave against the line of equality. In
other words, the closer the Lorenz curve is to the lineof
equlaity , the samlller is the degree of income disparity.
- Gini Coefficient, which takes a value between zero and
one, is calculated by taking the area "ABC" between
the Lorenz curve and the line of equlaity and dividing it
by the total area "ABD" below the line of equality.
A value of "zero" means absolute equality in the
housedhold income distribution, or every household has an
equal share of the total household income. A value of "one"
indicates one household earn the total household income
and the remining households earn nothing.

Table 3.1: Gini Coefficient, 1991 to 2001
|
Population Census or By-Census
|
Gini Coefficient
|
1971 |
0.430
|
1976 |
0.429
|
1981 |
0.451
|
1986 |
0.453
|
1991 |
0.476
|
1996 |
0.518
|
2001 |
0.525
|
Source: Table 6, Census and Statistics Department (2001).
View
Polygon
- According to the results of the 2001 Population Census,
the Gini coefficient based on houshold income is 0.525.
The corresponding figures for 1996 and 1991 were 0.518 and
0.476 respectively. These figures suggest that there has
been an increase in the extent of income inequality. The
Lorenz curves for 1991 , 1996, and 2001 are shown as below:

- The effect of social mobility should be taken into account
in studying income distribution. For instance, some households
falling in the low income decile groups in 1996 might have
moved up teh social ladder to higher income decile groups
in 2001. Their positions in the low income decile groups
might have been repalced by households newly formed by members
who have just entered the labour force.
- Moreover, the structural changes in an economy adn the
consequential transformation to occupational patterns should
be noted. Over the past decade, rapid structural transformation
in the Hong Kong economy has led to a strong and increasing
demand for managers, administrators, professional and associate
professionals, and hence faster increases in salaries and
wages for people working in these jobs than those woking
in other jobs which require lower level of knowlege and
skill. Their salaries has increased in a different speed
and income inequality is thus widen.
- Finally, it should be noted that there is no direct relationship
between the extent of poverty and the Gini coefficient.
An increase in the Gini coefficient implies rising income
inequality which does not necessarily indicate worsening
of the poverty. For example, when the rich become richer
while the poor also become richer, the Gini coefficient
may still increase as theer may be differential degree of
improvement in income for different groups of people. Hence,
in order to clarify the degree of poverty of an economy,
reference should also be made to other income statistics
in addition to the Ginin coefficient (e.g. median monthly
household income, monthly household income per capita, and
percentage distribution of monthly household income by decile
groups of domestic households).
Table3.2: Comparsion of Gini Coefficient
between Hong Kong and Other Countries, 2000-2001
|
Countries
|
Gini Coefficient
|
|
Finland
|
0.226
|
|
Indan
|
0.297
|
|
Indonesia
|
0.303
|
|
Canada
|
0.315
|
|
China
|
0.400
|
|
U.S.A
|
0.435
|
|
Philippine
|
0.461
|
|
Russia
|
0.518
|
|
Hong Kong
|
0.525
|
|
Ethiopia
|
0.572
|
Source: Human Development Report 2003 and
Table 6, Census and Statistics Department (2001).
Gini
coefficient in Central and Eastern Europe
|