{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Master"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Master","index":0,"n_rows":109,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":109,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"Comments on planning objectives","Other comments/specific views on individual Preliminary Master Plan Proposals:","Role","Date"]
["SECTION 1","WEBSITE"]
[1,"I would suggest that the University must build taller buildings so as to make effective use of limited space on the hill. The University should consider demolishing some of the too old buildings, on the New Asia campus, for instance, to build up more taller/higher buildings. If you continue to build just 3-4 storeyed buildings on too precious space, that would be a huge waste for the future development.","Uniqueness and modernness should be taken into serious consideration.","Teaching Staff","2007-09-25"]
[2,"To preserve greenery and history.","To preserve greenery and history.","Teaching Staff","2007-09-26"]
[3,"To facilitate the circulation of students within the university.","Students as the end users of the campus should be more involved in the planning process.","Student","2007-09-26"]
[4,"The environment should be sustained.","The new building should match the old one with \"cement\" cover. Otherwise, it is too odd to see colourful buildings/ new buildings. For example, see Standford University, polytechnics, University of Chicago. They all have an architecture style/ theme. But not found in CU. I like the old style with grey cover better. I want to preserve the old buildings.","Alumni","2007-09-26"]
[5,"Extend sustainability by reserving space for telecommunication infrastructure installation.","Harmonizing Chinese and Western culture in building designs.","Student","2007-09-26"]
[6,"在發展之餘繼續維持校園自然及優美之學習環境,以吸引更多海外專才以此為發展基地。","興建行人電梯由火車站至本部會引起大量工程,建成後亦會破壞山坡環境,長期開動電梯及照明等亦同樣引起能源浪費。","Student","2007-09-26"]
[7,"在維持校園發展與持續發展的同時，突顯大學承傳中國傳統優秀文化的角色。","校園發展固然重要，但我們不能只為發展而發展。重要的是，我們在增設每項設施時，必須先行考慮該項設施的實用性及藝術性，且要盡力使該項設施能夠反映中大獨有的人文精神。否則，「中大」一名只會流為一個地方的稱號，而喪失了其背後獨特的精神涵義。將「中大」變成「中環」，是一危險的行徑。世界知名而歷史悠久的學府，如英國的牛津、劍橋；美國的哈佛、耶魯，都不是「中環」。","Alumni","2007-09-27"]
[8,"To retain and reinforce the colleges' characteristics.","1) I believe most of consultants try to pull the Shaw College back to the University by building other colleges and hostels in the area around the current Residential 3 and 4. This is excellent. Yet, they didn't provide a concrete solution to make students feel easier to walk from the Shaw College to the Mall or other part of the university. 2) Area 39 should be the focus of future physical development, but the Mall should still be the focus of the future academical development. 3) Area 39 is a remote area from the KCRC station. Either by walking or buses, it might take 30 - 45 minutes to walk there. If students' hostels will be built in that area, a proper transport means must be provided. Setting up a new KCRC station in there is a nice idea ideally, but I am not optimistic towards this proposal. The consulting firms should provide a concrete and feasible solution for this problem.","Student","2007-09-27"]
[9,"To enhance quality of existing facilities through phased upgrading / redevelopment projects.","Building density and heights shall be under certain guidelines and control. Student / staff population per GFA shall also be summarized for each proposals, in comparison with other overseas universities for \"reality check\". ","Alumni","2007-09-27"]
[10,"Preservation of existing college system and the college campus integrity. To maintain the identity of the CUHK and differs from the other Universities.","Electrical walkways may not be the way to increase pedestrian flow. Hiking is distinct characteristics of CUHK life. Do we need to overly protect the students and able to appreciate the nature? Also to build around the train station and treat it as a major public area may destroy the integrity of the Chung Chi Campus, which I would object. The Central Walkway area should always be the focal point of all colleges to gather and should not shift focus - this will not be beneficial to NA, UC or Shaw students.","Alumni","2007-09-28"]
[11,"在發展的同時嘗試加入更多中國文化元素以突顯\"中文大學\"的獨特之處。","盡量減少空調的使用. 例如將大廈的走廊改為開放式, 引進自然風. 避免浪費電力。","Non-teaching staff","2007-10-02"]
[12,"暫時未想到，因為不明白「規劃」是什麼意義及你們的定義。","個人意見：讓校園內不同位置有不同特色，這樣就像百花齊放，豐富而共融，才是聚集世界全球人才的學習環境。","Non-teaching staff","2007-10-03"]
[13,"Keeping the character of CUHK campus which is built and sustained with the natural environment - don't want to lose all the valuable original spaces and turning the campus into a theme park for merely displaying some design architect's buildings only.","Long time maintenance and running cost of the escalators AND effectiveness of building the numerous corridors which can really facilitate and be suitable for students to walk under HK climate for attending classes is definitely the key consideration in considerating the latest proposed master plan schemes.","Alumni","2007-10-04"]
[14,"nil","I hope the decision of the development plan can be made by vote by every student and staff (include non-U contract staff).","Alumni","2007-10-04"]
[15,"校園發展應致力繼承中大的歷史傳統及文化，保持「人與自然和諧融合」的精神。","應加強向師生校友宣傳發展計劃，並鼓勵其發表意見，增強師生校友對校園發展的參與。","Student","2007-10-05"]
[16,"創造和突顯校園各部份的不同特色，令校園不同地域各有獨特個性。","在個別地區（如書院）發展細節上，應個別諮詢有關人士的意見和意願再作決定。","Student","2007-10-09"]
[17,"To reflect the vision of the university of building knowledge upon the heritage of the west and the east. ","Strike a balance between University and Colleges in the size of buildings. For example, the axis along the Mall spans across the West and the East reflects the vision as stated in the beginning. Ideally, there is a Mega Assembly Hall on the Mall to symbolise the increasing campus population. The buildings on the Axis rise and falls in line with the landscape and symbolise the backbone of the dragon that the founder of the University envisioned. The webs of colleges are interconnected by a multitude of means, preferrable through building access.","Alumni","2007-10-12"]
[18," 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！","反對新書院！！ 堅決反對已經提交的四項方案！！！！！！！！！！！！！！","Student","2007-10-20"]
[19," 校園必須民主化: 校政決策要透明及民主參與. 譬如: 校園規劃要有參與機制, 讓學生與校友加入規劃委員會, 運作要公開透明.","多聽學生的意見","Others (Please specify) : 關心中大發展的市民","2007-10-21"]
[20,"保持中大固有特色,特別是自然環境和舊有建築物","四個建議均嚴重破壞原有校園設計","Student","2007-10-22"]
[21,"目標C項只重發展,漠視中大傳統。其他目標應包括:得到師生和校友認同;保持4書院原建築特色;保存中大富意義建築;節約能源的建築設計;盡量不破壞原有樹木.","4個計劃皆達不到基本要求,應該重新諮詢,重新設計。","Student","2007-10-23"]
[22,"以集體回憶為依歸，保護大學校園有重要意義和歷史價值的建築物及象徵","應盡量保護現有環境及建築，將大部份新建築放在外圍地區，保持中大青山綠水的郊野特色，同時不應過份發展，當港大目標是增加3-4000人的時候，為甚麼中大的目標居然是增加至萬多人到三萬人，數字的誇大會使發展會變得不切實際。","Alumni","2007-10-24"]
[23,"應保留書院特色，不應破壞書院現有的整體性，現有建築及自然環境","校方偽諮詢令人失望。新書院事件已失望，為建新書院而不斷砍伐樹林，這次校園發展計劃亦同樣，不見得起了些甚麼有蓋行人通道就可免日灑雨淋，其實大自然已給我們最好的天然屏障，就是樹木﹗又何必為了建人工屏障或新的建築物而除去大量的天然屏障？根本與整個中大的自然環境發展理念背道而馳，還說甚麼環保？環保不應只顧及再生能源；環保，即是環境保育，大前題是保護現有的自然環境，而不是透過安頓人之所需而去破壞自然環境然後才去善後補償，現在所提出的四個計劃給我的感覺全是這樣，簡直與現在中大管理層的作風同出一徹!","Alumni","2007-10-24"]
[24,"perserved the precious salient tradition/buildings/features of the existing colleges","The existing plan/conceptual idea is ridiculous. Broader discussion with more time allowed should have been encouraged before the plan is fixed.","Alumni","2007-10-24"]
[25,"請參閱「其他意見/對個別校園發展計劃初步建議的看法」。","過份強調數目及「硬性指標」成效，追求不切合大學需要的功利主義發展，破壞本身擁有的良好傳統，放棄歷屆畢業生共同分享的印記，沒有可取之處。 現在校園發展計劃，反映大學的發展方向，應該立即全面重新評估，找出真正切合大學「可持續發展」目標，是在於質的成長，而不是量的不斷盲目成增長發展。在此方向下，校園發展計劃才會成功，不會成為急功冒進的假大空宏圖大計。 校園發展計劃，是大學管理人員在不切實際的「國際化」及「學店化」幻想產物。大學當局急需開誠佈公，廣納各方意見意，訂出符合大學本身特色的發展方向，再行修訂現時公佈的校園發展計劃，以配合現實中大學應該有的發展目標。","Alumni","2007-10-26"]
[26,"如上","切合實際要求","Alumni","2007-10-27"]
[27,"不要破壞中大校園的特色","中大山形不是發展障礙，是中大的特色，中大的優點。這個是年年書通都會說，年年書通考試都會考，請不要忘記。","Student","2007-10-27"]
[28,"Preservation of existing buildings, esp. those with high historical, cultural and architectural values.","Students' preference on the 4 proposals should be one of the criteria in assessing the 4 proposals","Student","2007-10-28"]
[29,"在發展之時考慮保留大學原有建校理念及獨有的特色。","學校規劃應有更詳細及普遍地諮詢大學員生。","Student","2007-10-28"]
[30,"Keep the trees and our history.","Keep the trees and keep the natural resources","Alumni","2007-10-28"]
[31,"強化中大書院制的特色 以中國文化為本位作出發展","部分計劃太過急進，會令中大面目全非，要小心規劃及多作諮詢。","Alumni","2007-10-28"]
[32,"保留中大特色",null,"Student","2007-10-28"]
[33,"發展教育理念，為社會未來發展培養人才，並提升學生的知識水平、文化水平、道德水平和批判思考能力","發展教育理念比成為一所具領導地位的研究型綜合大學更為重要，作為一所高等教育機構，教育是其存在的目的。但若在構思學校未來發展上只著重於發展校園，實在是本末倒置之做法，嚴重侵害大學的尊嚴，和對教育界的侮辱。","Student","2007-10-28"]
[34,"To set up more open systems to let students join in the planning of the future development and directions of the school","no","Student","2007-10-29"]
[35,"校園發展同時需保育校園以至大學整體的特式及傳統 。加強校園與周邊社區以至社會整體的聯繫與溝通, 避免與世隔絕","1. 第二、三及四個方案裏都有提及興建自動化行人道, 但均未有交代在運作是否較校巴更環保, 例如在人流較少時是否長時間開放, 不禁令人懷疑需耗鉅資興建及維修的電動行人道是否較新一代柴油校巴更具成本及環境效益。而第三個方案中建議的park-and-ride 的概念亦比單以行人道取代校巴來得實際。 2. 第三個方案 (Dennis Lau & Ng Chun Man Architects & Engineers (HK) Ltd. /Woods Bagot, Australia) 提到減少新建建築物, 這點很重要, 既可以節省發展成本, 又可以保留校園原貌, 尤其是在現有建築群週邊。 3. 第四個方案 (P&T Architects & Engineers Ltd / Perkins + Will, USA) 提到校園需訂立長遠的排放控制和中和規劃, 值得校方考慮。大學作為社會的先驅, 在承擔環境責任方面亦應如此。 4. 四個方案均沒有提及在發展同時, 如何對現有中大校園的自然環境加以保護。中大過後已經多次因發展需要而大規模砍樹, 例如科學館下面的山坡和李達三樓外。本人希望校園在日後的發展中不再需要校園環境付出如此的代價。","Alumni","2007-10-30"]
[36,"1)carbon and eco footprint.2)Lifestyle.","設計欠創意和詩意,沒有進步. 期待較前瞻性的設計以展示未來的校園生活和更好的學習方式.","Student","2007-11-01"]
["SECTION 2","COLLECTION BOX"]
[null,"Comments on planning objectives","Other comments/specific views on individual Preliminary Master Plan Proposals:","Role","Time"]
[1,"加強各新、舊學院之間的交流，縮短各學院的行車時間；舉辦更多新、舊學院的「聯院活動」\n更新宿舍內的設施","中大某些路/樓梯比較陰森，有沒有辦法改善這個問題？\n運用renewable sources概念很好，但where can we put the solar panels, and so on？\nFor cycling path where can we put our bicycles?\nCan we have a museum to introduce our history to the public?","Student"]
[2,"To preserve the character and history heritage of the university.",null,"Student"]
[3,"To preserve unique features and cultures of the University.",null,"Student"]
[4,"提供公眾活動空間，促進大學與社區的互動，以履行大學對社會的責任。","全民公投修改了的計劃，絕非只有幾位高層決定。","Student"]
[5,"維持並增強中大校園(建設)的特色，致力完善保留傳統文化及自然景觀。","若有新建設，請作充分諮詢。","Student"]
[6,"保留具歷史意義或特別重要的建築或環境",null,"Student"]
[7,"大學基本設施(e.g.飯堂、小賣店)在校園合理分配","使用者參與規劃，包括未來用家(現時的中學生)。","Student"]
[8,"創造更多自主學習空間","全面禁止車在中大校園，並將之變成公共空間，是一個很好的原則。","Student"]
[9,"以學生為依歸，為方便學生學習及全人發展。","此計劃對學生宣傳不足，簡報會只以電郵通知，以致出席人數偏低，本人是由報章得知消息。此外難以分辨回應proposal的分別。","Student"]
[10,"To be an international university in Hong Kong","Pedestrian friendly concept is very attractive and important.","Student"]
[11,"確立中文大學校舍特式，統一校園特色或強化各書院風格。","校園若能增加一個有標誌性的活動地方，可讓多數學生在任何天氣下活動的大空間，可有助強化學生對校園的投入及歸屬感。","Student"]
[12,null,"現時以校巴來往校園各地方的方法完全超出負荷，必須加建行人道。另由於上落山花很大氣力，自動化的行人通道是必須的。行人扶手電梯將十分有效。","Student"]
[13,"儘量保存山林景色，綠化建築物與四周圍環境融合。",null,"Student"]
[14,"應以校園規劃與環境保育及各書院之傳統間取得平衡","若要興建新書院則必須考慮新書院對原有的四所書院的影響，各書院位置亦不宜過於接近，更不宜混亂於其他書院之中，這樣會有損書院的凝聚力及團結精神和各宿舍間的合一。","Student"]
[15,"學生為本","赤泥坪起書院","Student"]
[16,null,"有必要加強逸夫書院之對外交通聯繫\n加大中大建築面積同時亦要有適度交通配套","Student"]
[17,null,"建築太密集，可否有天台花園?","Student"]
[18,"架空天橋雖能加快人流，但卻大大破壞學生/ 教員與中大自然/ 文化環境的連繫。","中大為校園而不是酒店，應以務實為主，要加強人文歷史。","Teaching Staff & Alumni"]
[19,null,"行人運輸系統可取","Teaching Staff"]
[20,"未發展的大學有非常自動綠化環境，如何令新建築物的周邊保持足夠的綠化空間，建築物中會否有空中花園等建築。","如何增加學生選擇大學進修時的考慮。如大學擴充而招不到學生，大學的擴充會被窒礙。一個令人嚮往的大學應有溫暖互動的生活。","Teaching Staff"]
[21,null,"用單軌電車連接各書院\n建單車徑在Area39","Non-teaching staff"]
[22,null,"A pedestrian-friendly covered walkway/ access network is important for all CU members to enjoy campus life.","Non-teaching staff"]
[23,"保留中大建築傳統文化及氣息，新建築應配合及融入現有建築。","減少過於現代化(如玻璃幕牆) 建築\n可透過改善交通安排而避免興建過多有礙觀瞻(如連接天橋)的建設","Alumni"]
[24,"To keep CUHK heritage and unique features","Some of the concepts are too drastic. We don't want more and more multipurpose complexes being built in a current greenery condition (like Central Lab Building and MongmanWan) don’t blend well with the old campus.","Alumni"]
[25,null,"I'd like to suggest to preserve 大學體育館 (前\"臨宿\") and also to construct a pedestrian path 由 (四條柱) 大埔道入口至 U. Lib. This is a reminder to CU identify and spirit. Use of solar energy in new hostels.","Alumni"]
[26,"歷史文化環境保育 (反對拆卸邵逸夫堂)",null,"Alumni"]
[27,null,"行人上蓋及其他物料勿用透明及積聚熱力的物料，勿做平面的因恐防有樹葉積聚在上不能掉下來，難於清理(可參考大埔火車站的行人通道上蓋以作反面教材)。","聽講座的人"]
[28,null,"Proposal B, D 中部份架空行人通道並非必要，且有損中大一貫和大自然配合之形象","Student"]
[29,null,"建築道路，建築物時設計需配合長遠發展作詳細考慮，避免短時間內要重新規劃的問題。","Student"]
[30,"切合學生意願，學生能參與規劃過程\n維持大學的自然環境","新書院何不合併? 如何照料較遠的ihouse同學? 會增加shaw設施嗎?","Student"]
[31,"To perserve the well-nurtured culture and green environment of CUHK","highrises with a commercial design and the many walkways with cyber decorations are not suitable for our campus","Student"]
[32,null,"Safety of pedestrian and all road vehicles is paramount, and cannot wait","Teaching Staff"]
["SECTION 3","EMAIL"]
[null,"Comments on planning objectives","Other comments/specific views on individual Preliminary Master Plan Proposals:","Role","Date"]
[1,null,"Will we have chances to give suggestion, poll or something? You never mention we can do anything during the process of proposing. Aren't we just invited to listen and see?","Student","2007-09-20"]
[2,null,"Availability of your information also on the web would render your purpose more fruitful. I look forward to hearing from it.","NA","2007-09-21"]
[3,null,"I must say I am deeply disappointed when I received the email below - the EXTRAORDINARY timing that you have arranged for the presentation sessions on the proposals on campus master plan with Q&As to happen.\n\n\n","Alumni","2007-09-21"]
[null,null,"If the Steering Committee, or indeed the University itself, is in touch with its alumni and the present commercial world's working environment, you would indeed understand that the ungodly timing of 5:45pm at the University as the starting time for weekday session is extremely inconvenient to the alumni and any members who are concerned about the development, when the official working hours normally ends at 6pm. And on Saturdays when those around my graduate years need to attend various courses such as MBAs, classes normally ends around 6pm also. Or this is the intention of the Steering Committee that you would rather wish the lesser people to come and learn about the plan the better, so that first, you have satisfied and presented yourself being diplomatic and open enough to seek consultations from various parties and second, make it inconvenient for those who might not agree with the proposals and thus a potential to challenge the University? Which I believe this is not the case and the intention of the Steering Committee but rather on oversight; this also proves that as an alumus we need to voice out our opinion more so that the University would understand us and we would also need to be in closer touch with our beloved alma mater."]
[null,null,"\nIf indeed, the steering Committee is eager to seek advice and opinions from those who have a strong feeling and attachment towards the University, please re-consider the arrangement of the timings of such session. I would recommend starting the weekday sessions at 7pm and the Saturday session at 6pm, so that for those who would need to attend various courses such as MBA classes would also be able to attend. I myself at the moment would only be available for Saturday session and will try to be as on time as possible"]
[4,null,"May I ask whether there is a website mainly describes these plans and further details?","Student","2007-09-21"]
[5,null,"If the time for exhibition of the proposals can be extended a bit longer e.g. till 8:00pm daily, it should be much more convenient to those interested parties as I guess many of the CUHK colleagues are still struggling with the daily routines in their offices at 6:00pm on weekdays. Also, it would be highly appreciated if the relevant models/ proposals can be posted on the internet.","Staff","2007-09-24"]
[6,null,"1. The plan assumes the land in the new northern campus will be granted by the Government.  If the Government refuses or grants another piece of land, the whole plan has to change.  It will waste a lot of resources on such planning.  I do not oppose such assumption at the initial planning stage.  It should be cautious to invest further resources into the planning in the next stage before the land has been granted.\n2. The plan assumes that the population flow in the campus is 30,000 by 2021.  Is it accurate?  Is this the direction of development we want?  It is debatable on the population growth of the campus.  CUHK should consult on a broader perspective of development.","Teaching Staff & Alumni","2007-10-16"]
[null,null,"3. The plan will be implemented by phases and may revise after the plan is approved.  If there is no open and transparent planning process in place, the CUHK may change the plan without further consultation. What we express in the consultation exercise may not be respected.\n4. Even if the plan is carried out, the practice is whenever CUHK gets some resources or funding, it will look for some land for construction.  This will frustrate the plan as occurred decades in CUHK. Hence, it is crucial to establish a transparent and open mechanism of planning.  "]
[null,null,"5. There should be a human rights mainstreaming on the planning. For example, there should be an equal access for the disabled in the campus.  Participation by different stake-holders (staff, students, alumni) in the planning process, no matter consultation or decision making, should be enhanced.\n6. The plan should consider how to create a public space that facilitates communication."]
[null,null,"7. CUHK should release sufficient information to enable a meaningful consultation.  For example, the brief by CUHK to the four consultants, financial implication of each proposal, the full proposal of the consultants, which buildings will be demolished and how many trees (with a breakdown of their ages) will be cut down, the transcript of each consultation meeting or simply upload the video recording of the whole process into the website.\n8. CUHK should disclose how to deal with the views gathered during the consultation period.  I suggest publicizing all the views expressed and publish a consultation report.  There should be another consultation in the next stage of planning."]
[7,null,"The key question about the 'sustainability' (tremendously wrong choice of word, in my view) of a university is what we want to achieve.\n'Sutainability' is a state of continuation that leads to a final goal. The goal of your master plan is unclear. There is no causal relationship between a building plan and the greatness of our university.\nWhat makes a university great?\nOne can have all sorts of answers, but having beautiful and modern architecture is definitely not one of them. I had the opportunity of spending a month at the Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University this summer. Architecture does not strike me as the reason why Kellogg is considered one of the best business schools in the world.\nI appreciate the contribution of our Medical School, which is very well run, and did achieve excellence in many areas as seen during the SARS outbreak. But what about others?\nHow many Nobel prizes have our professors won?\nHow many Young Scientists Awards have our students won?\nWhat is the ranking of our Business School, started in the 60's with Prof Esby, now struggling to compete with HKUST?\nHow many of our literature students become good authors?","Alumni","2007-10-26"]
[null,null,"Has anyone of our Journalism students won any international awards?\nWhat inventions have our electronics/computer science departments been applied worldwide?\nWhat contribution has the university made in the past 20 years, to itself, the academic world, Hong Kong and mankind at large?\nHarvard, Cambridge, Oxford, Standford universities do not need a 'sustainability' plan to make themselves sustainable!\nPutting money on fancy buildings is clearly misusing resources.\nMy suggestion is that if we can find the sort of resoruces to build a beautiful campus, let's use only half of the money to build the necessary additons in lecturing facilities and computer infrastructure. Please invest the rest in teaching and research facilities. There is no prblem for young students to walk around the campus without elevators.  \nI look forward to academic achievement related goals and execution plans as an alumni. After all, universities are about learning and creating, and I urge you and the University Board to seriously consider how money should be better spent."]
[8,null,"Stop further development!!","Student","31-0ct-07"]
[9,null,"From my point of views, CUHK already have enough space compared to any other universities in Hong Kong.\nI felt the strong motherhood feelings with CUHK's old constructions and buildings.   Well, I highly reject the \"Concrete Jungle\" ways of constructions. \nEach university has their own Culure and Style.\nIf CUHK really need expansion, I suggested you should go to the other side of newly developed slopes.  Or try your very best to reduce the density of buildings.   CUHK has an academic style that can show on the traditional buildings, the style is always admirable. \nI hope you can kindly consider my suggestions. ","Alumni","2007-11-01"]
[10,null,"\nI support improved transportation around the University that is not vehicular. Our mountainous terrain is both a strength (in terms of beauty and sense of discrete sections) and a challenge - the climate makes walking uphill unpleasant in summer. I do not support increased bus transport, e.g. the nonsense of replacing the light shuttle buses with the large pink monsters is regrettable. So the only feasible alternative I can think of is escalators which would be quiet and personalized (no waiting for buses). Escalators could allow the reduction of car parking around the campus. \nThe planning for the University of the future needs to include better exercise options. Given the climate, having an excellent indoor fitness room is essential. The current 'nissan hut' with outdated equipment, often in poor states of repair, is simply inadequate. An international campus needs a state-of-the-art fitness room open seven days a week. Please note that my comments about the current fitness room in no way reflect on the PE Unit. The staff there are very helpful but the funding available to them is not adequate.\n","Teaching Staff","2007-11-01"]
[11,null,"\n1. As being one of the best universities in Asia, CUHK should give students, faculty and visitors a sense of consistency. Most buildings are built in different \"colors\", which are not highly matched with Tolo Harbour and the mountain. I suggest CUHK to think about a school color.  Also, the new buildings should be sustainable to the environment (i.e. make the best use of light energy and green environment)\n2. There is a need to have a central park. We have some beautiful sightseeing spots such as C.C. lake. However, for \"phototaking\" purpose and lesiure, we should have a central park somewhere on the central campus. This central park is a mix of modern and traditional culture.\n3. There is a need to have a landmark building. A landmark building can represent and promote CU. Imagine you are a visitor of HK, what can you remember?\nPerhaps we can renovate and integrate the buildings near Benjamin Building and make a \"tall\" building for recreational, cultural and social activities such as concerts, student club gatherings and cultural exchange activities.\n\n","Alumni","2007-11-01"]
[13,null,"\nI looked at the plans, some of which were very imaginative.\nMy comments would be that during the very hot and wet session to what extent would the outside areas be used? I don't think that the design D in particular takes this aspect into consideration. Also how can you have a car free campus in the hot and wet sesson.\n","Teaching Staff","2007-11-05"]
[14,null,"After reviewing the proposals that were available on line, I am very pleased and excited about the direction the University is going. However, I have one fear: as one of the key points the Committee has decided upon is a car-free campus (I am strongly in agreement), all of the proposals shared features that would turn the now roads into pedestrian walkways. That is all well and good, however, I would stress to the Committee that this cannot occur in several key places because it might cause issues for emergency vehicles if, God forbid, an emergency occurred for example on the Central Plaza. I am sure that the Committee is well aware of this concern, I just needed to set speak out to set my own conscious at peace.\nIn summation:\nThe various proposals for eliminating certain roadways in favor of pedestrian walk zones is a very exciting prospect, however, the design should incorporate easy access for emergency vehicles especially in the parts of campus that are difficult to reach by vehicle.\nThank you for your time and for your efforts. I know I join my peers in expressing our gratitude for keeping all aspects of this proposal as available as possible.\n","Teaching Staff","2007-11-05"]
[15,null,"\nI support the retainment of the old buildings of the CU campus as every renowned university in the world has its own theme of architecture.  \nI support the building of a warm water swimming pool inside campus, therefore alumni, stafff, students and the athletes can enjoy swimming inside the campus.\n","Alumni","2007-11-12"]
[16,null,"Pls note that I & my wife (also an alumni) have been enjoying the swimming pool for over 20 years every weekend.  Although I still like the outdoor swimming pool, however, it's sad to see that it's not being used in the Winters.  Perhaps in the new campus planning, cud we plan for the latest state-of-the-art swimming pool such that in Summer, people can still enjoy the sunshine (like outdoor), while in Winter, people can enjoy the (indoor) warm water.\nAnother point that I noticed from other comments is that there r too many buildings close to the train station.  This is of course convenient to the city people.  However, as we need to encourage more healthy lifestyle (especially we r in the New Territories with a lot of space), I wud like to see more buildings on mountain tops.  Campus bus can carry people from train station to mountain tops, then there'll b stairways downhill.\n","Alumni","2007-11-12"]
[17,null,"The Management of CU appeared to be open-minded, appeared to be listening, appeared to be anything which appeals to the public, but you shall do whatever you planned. Therefore, I am glad that I did not waste my time to attend the discussion meeting held before. I would suggest if the management sticks to what they have decided, then don't waste our time to review your options. Just do it in the black box, and I save my time to read the progress. ","not mentioned","2007-11-13"]
[18,null," My friends told me that during the meeting, Prof Ching was very patient to listen, but strictly stick to what the management has planned. If the management has no plan to accept other people's opinions, even the toppest PR team in the world can never help you to build up an \"open-minded\" / \"accepting opinions\" image. We are not stupid, right? So, if the management's decision will never change, then I would suggest they simply do it in the black box without holding any meetings for opinions. At least we are happy for saving our valuable time.","not mentioned","2007-11-16"]
["SECTION 4","FAX"]
[null,"Comments on planning objectives","Other comments/specific views on individual Preliminary Master Plan Proposals:","Role","Time"]
[1,null,"The \"cascades\" effect of campus design and the \"axis-web\" concept seemed practical.","Non-teaching staff","2007-10-09"]
[2,"強烈要求保留中大的人文精神與簡樸校園氣氛","這問卷的設計欠實質內容，既定方針是一定發展","Student","2007-11-02"]
["SECTION 5","MAIL"]
[null,"Comments on planning objectives","Other comments/specific views on individual Preliminary Master Plan Proposals:","Role","Time"]
[1,null,"Please listen to users' needs","Teaching staff","2007-09-28"]
[2,"須就大學原有之理念作出相應的規劃，例如《香港中文大學條例》所訂明之書院制，並維持書院間的個體性及特色。","注意層與層之間的有機連繫，不要把新建築物變成純粹的校園通道\n需要一定的設計以助師生享受中大特有的自然環境，避免「都會化」校園。","Student","2007-10-09"]
[3,null,"設計太新穎的大樓不乎合中文大學充滿書卷味的校園氣氛\n保存現有建築物之風貌是非常重要的","Teaching staff & Alumni","2007-10-10"]
[4,null,"可增添中華文化形式建築","Alumni","2007-10-10"]
[5,null,"Need to perserve or offer views of \"山水\" from as many buildings/ windows as possible, as well as preserving greenery.  This is CUHK's \"iconic campus\", not any one building or area.","Teaching staff","2007-10-10"]
[6,"Partnership with the community - A centre for cultural, recreational & even financial development (e.g. exhibitions)","1) If the railways station is located further north by 100 metres, it will ease congestion & bring traffic to north of Ling Nam Stadium (which is blocking the way). \n2) More classrooms along railine? Will facilitate extra-mural courses i.e. students can come easily like City-U?","Teaching staff","2007-11-06"]